Connect with us

Uncategorized

Jeanie Buss still consults Magic Johnson on Lakers, but her best bet would be going outside the organization

Published

on


The Los Angeles Lakers don’t exactly have a clear chain of command when it comes to basketball operations. Rob Pelinka is nominally the team’s top decision-maker as vice president of basketball operations, but former Laker Kurt Rambis, whose title of senior basketball advisor undersells his position within the organization, also seemingly holds significant sway. His wife, Linda Rambis, is a long-time friend and advisor to owner Jeanie Buss, and rumors have also suggested that CEO Tim Harris occasionally weighs in on basketball matters. This is before we consider the influence held by Rich Paul and Klutch Sports, who represent LeBron James, Anthony Davis, Talen Horton-Tucker, Kendrick Nunn and numerous former Lakers. Pelinka claims to consult James and Davis on major decisions, but recent reporting indicates that may not be the case. 

This should already send a very clear message that there are too many cooks in the kitchen. Most successful franchises understand this, including the Lakers, who for quite some time were guided by one of the greatest general managers in the history of sports in Jerry West. One of the coaches West hired, Pat Riley now has complete control over the Miami Heat and has taken them to the NBA Finals six times. The best teams tend to hire the best people and leave them alone to do their jobs. The Lakers aren’t doing that. In fact, they’re consulting people that aren’t even technically employed by the organization.

At least, they aren’t anymore. Jeanie Buss told The Athletic’s Bill Oram in a story published Monday that she still consults Magic Johnson about basketball matters. “To me, he’s still working with us,” Buss said. “In terms of an official capacity, in the NBA, you have to be very clear as to who can negotiate on your behalf and who can’t. So he doesn’t have that official designation. But in terms of his support, his wisdom, his insight, I freely call on him as needed.”

Advertisement

Specifically, she spoke to him earlier in the season to address the Lakers’ struggles. “I just sat down with him,” Buss told The Athletic, “and I said, ‘Should I be concerned? What are you seeing?’ And he just talked about, you know, the injuries and that the team hadn’t had a chance to be together. … So, you know, he’s very calm and insightful. And it, you know, I appreciate his seeing the big picture instead of reacting to every game.”

Johnson is one of the greatest players in NBA history, and perhaps the best ever to wear a Lakers uniform. He is also a somewhat problematic source of basketball insight for the following reasons:

  • Johnson, former president of basketball operations for the Lakers, resigned abruptly on the eve of the 2019 season finale.
  • He proceeded to bash a number of executives currently employed by the Lakers on his way out the door. He accused Pelinka of “backstabbing” and claimed that Harris prevented him from firing Luke Walton as the team’s head coach.
  • Part of what Johnson accused Pelinka of saying behind his back was that he “wasn’t working hard enough,” but in that same interview, Johnson revealed that he took the Lakers job with the understanding that he would not be giving up his other business interests. “I make more money doing that,” Johnson said on First Take. Buss apparently approved of an arrangement in which Johnson would be “in and out,” but again, this is not how most general managers operate. Johnson left the job in part because he could not commit himself enough to it in order to do it properly, yet his opinion seemingly holds as much weight as those who have made the commitments necessary to provide informed insight into modern-day roster-building.
  • He has publicly criticized the Lakers on multiple occasions since, most recently for their “lack of effort.”
  • His tenure wasn’t exactly successful. The Lakers went 72-92 in his two full seasons at the helm. He played a part in recruiting James, but it’s unclear how much credit he truly deserves for that, and the first team he put around James missed the playoffs (though injuries played a major part in that).

None of this is meant to directly disparage Johnson’s basketball acumen. He is an on-court legend who might have grown into a strong general manager if given enough time and latitude in the position. But his shadow almost certainly undermines players and executives that the organization currently employs, and he himself has admitted that he is not as qualified to make roster-building decisions as full-time NBA executives. He is yet another cook in an already crowded kitchen.

Further, he isn’t one that provides an especially unique perspective. Rambis was his teammate on the Showtime Lakers. Both display an increasingly disturbing trend in Los Angeles. The Buss family simply does not look outside of the organization for advice on running their basketball team. Since Dr. Jerry Buss purchased the Lakers in 1979, the family has entrusted five different people to lead the franchise’s basketball operations. All five were connected to the Lakers in some significant way. West and Johnson were legendary players for the franchise. Mitch Kupchak was a backup for them in the 1980s and apprenticed under West in the front office. Jim Buss was the son of Dr. Buss. Pelinka was the agent to Kobe Bryant, another team legend.

Staying within the Laker family has largely been a successful approach. They’ve won 11 championships since the Buss family assumed control of the franchise. But that success has blinded the Lakers to the ways in which the sport of basketball has changed in part to combat their dominance. They had missed the playoffs five years in a row before James arrived, and had he not signed up, that streak might be intact today. The acquisition of Russell Westbrook was a vintage Lakers move. All stylistic concerns aside, Westbrook was a star, and the Lakers always prioritize the acquisition of stars. They went on to sign five more former All-Stars in the offseason and during the season: Carmelo Anthony, Rajon Rondo, Dwight Howard, DeAndre Jordan and Isaiah Thomas. Only the Anthony signing has been a success. 

If Buss is going to consult people not currently employed by the Lakers on basketball matters, it therefore might behoove her to consult people who lack any association with the Lakers whatsoever. What this front office needs, more than anything, is a dose of common sense. Someone in a position with considerable influence needed to look around the room when the rest of his front office was about to trade for Westbrook and ask “wait a minute, he can’t shoot or defend, are we sure this is a good idea?” This is how normal teams operate. The Lakers do not function as a normal team does.

They didn’t need to for most of their history. They had so many institutional advantages that Lakers exceptionalism was a viable team-building strategy. But as this season has proven, the rest of the NBA has grown smarter while the Lakers have stagnated with the same, uncreative roster-building strategies that they’ve been using for 40 years. There are a number of ways the Lakers could improve their front office process in the coming months and years. Establishing a clear hierarchy would work wonders. Prioritizing analytics and forward-thinking strategic approaches would be very helpful. But the one thing the Lakers need more than anything else is to start acting a little bit less like the Lakers. They should be consulting people untainted by decades of Lakers exceptionalism, not someone whose whole basketball life has revolved around it. 

Advertisement



Source link

Uncategorized

Draymond Green Says Players Are Protecting Their Shooting Percentage In The Playoffs

Published

on


(Photo by Ezra Shaw/Getty Images)

 

Golden State Warriors star Draymond Green remains a relevant name around the NBA with his analysis of the game.

Green is one of the most respected voices among players when it comes to breaking down the game.

Advertisement

The four-time NBA champion has been analyzing the playoffs and recently pointed out something he doesn’t like that he is seeing.

Green took offense to the players who hold the ball when the clock is running out of time during the playoffs.

He explained that Stephen Curry is somebody that doesn’t hesitate to take these big shots, no matter how far he is from the rim.

Advertisement

Green admits that it’s easy for Curry to do this since he’s the best shooter of all time.

Then again, he recalled two long shots from Jordan Poole at the buzzer that played a big role in the Warriors’ championship.

Being Stephen Curry, it’s easy for you to take shots from anywhere, but Curry urging his teammates to attempt these shots has also helped his team.

The Nuggets and Heat have taken these shots during the three games of the series, but Green doesn’t like how shy some players have been throughout the playoffs.

If they aspire to win the championship, they need to go further, take more risks, and hope they end up helping the team.

Advertisement

Both teams have good shooters that can make long-range shots with ease.

Making a buzzer-beater won’t make them champions at all, but it can certainly give them a boost to beat their rivals, as Green explains.

The post Draymond Green Says Players Are Protecting Their Shooting Percentage In The Playoffs appeared first on The Cold Wire.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Opportunity Analysis: How Matthew Tkachuk kept the Panthers alive in Game 3 win

Published

on


If I were to play armchair psychologist – a dangerous thing when doing hockey analysis – I’d say the time off between rounds three and four didn’t help the Florida Panthers. Partially because it killed their momentum, but also because it gave them time to read their news clippings and believe their own hype.

How had they made it as far as this? Well, if you read a lot of pro-Panthers pieces, Matthew Tkachuk and the boys burst through the arena walls like some collective Kool-Aid man, went right at their opponents, and made life hell for them. We spent a lot of time talking about Tkachuk’s edge and Sam Bennett’s hits and Radko Gudas’ nastiness and so on. You could easily come to believe it was their gritty play (with goaltending) that got them where they were.

In Games 1 and 2 of the Stanley Cup Final they came out and played like that gritty style was their sole goal. They wanted to be the bully, and they didn’t do enough actual playing. As our own Iain MacIntyre noted, through the first two games Tkachuk played 34.5 minutes, while taking 36 PIMs. That’s not a great ratio for a Hart Trophy finalist.

Advertisement

In Game 3 he didn’t take any penalties, recorded no hits, and instead racked up a goal and an assist for two points, and was plus-3 in 18 minutes despite missing a chunk of the game in the quiet room.

When combing through the NHL’s EDGE IQ data (powered by AWS), it was fun to look at Tkachuk’s impact on projected goal rates (PGR), because he’s the primary figure involved in every piece of Florida’s offence. Their formula is as simple as it’s been the whole way through: they need saves, and they need Tkachuk to drag that offence to three goals (at a minimum) each night.

As you’ll see, where PGR is high, he’s the reason. Where it’s low and they still score, he makes the difference. Let’s look at Florida’s three goals from Game 3, and I’ll show you what I mean.

.acf-block-preview .br-snippet {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 200px 1fr;
gap: 20px;
width: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 16px;
border: 1px solid #CECECE;
background-color: #FFF;
border-radius: 4px;
}
.acf-block-preview .br-snippet-info a {
text-decoration: none;
}
.acf-block-preview .br-snippet-info .br-snippet-title {
color: #343434;
font-family: ‘roboto’;
font-size: 20px;
font-weight: 600;
line-height: 22px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
top: -3px;
}
.acf-block-preview .br-snippet-info .br-snippet-body {
color: #343434;
font-family: ‘urw-din’;
font-size: 16px;
line-height: 20px;
margin-bottom: 12px;
}
.acf-block-preview .br-snippet-info .br-snippet-link-title {
display: inline-block;
font-family: ‘urw-din’;
font-size: 16px;
list-style-type: none;
width: auto;
}
.acf-block-preview .br-snippet-info .br-snippet-link-title:not(:last-child):after {
content: ‘ | ‘;
color: #343434;
}

The Game-Winning Goal

Tkachuk might be present-day Justin Williams in terms of clutchiness (that’s definitely a word, please don’t look it up just trust me). Tkachuk has scored three overtime winners, a series clincher in the dying seconds of regulation, set up another OT winner, and had a hand in Thursday night’s winner as well.

Advertisement

By Opportunity Analysis the OT winner graded out as a “low quality” chance, for fairly obvious reasons. It’s a clean shot from distance, unscreened, and Adin Hill is directly square to the shot without hindrance. (If he had a case for the Conn Smythe Trophy, this goal going in probably torpedoed that.)

Let’s have one look at the goal first. Watch Tkachuk come from the centre red line and go right down main street. His route is a teaching moment for young players looking for ways to be more involved in the offence.


The goal has some elements of the Game 3 OT winner versus the Toronto Maple Leafs, where a regroup and an assumed dump-in instead turns into the Panthers holding on to the puck and gaining the zone.

But on the shot itself — which Opportunity Analysis grades out as a low quality chance — look at the biggest factors which influenced that low rating, starting at the top of the clock, and working around to the smallest. Red indicates the factor lowered the PGR (as in, an influence that makes the attempt less likely to be a goal), and green the opposite:


The distance the shot was taken away from the goal line makes this chance less likely to go in. Same with how far away from the net the puck last passed across the middle of the ice (that’s “meridian crossing location”), and that the goalie is square to the puck (goalie angle) and in his proper stance (goalie height).

The only factors that say “this may increase the likelihood of the chance going in” are meridian related, and…they don’t actually impact this particular goal much (aside from the shot coming from dead centre of the ice, which is “distance to meridian”) even though the puck had just crossed the middle (“time since meridian crossing”).

But the model notes there’s no “screen” on the play here, right? Take another look from the goalie’s eyes and again notice Tkachuk’s positioning:

Advertisement

This is the Tkachuk factor and where guys like him, who are always around these areas, make life hard for goalies. It sure feels like he’s going to be in the lane of the shot, or will tip it, or will impact this play in some way, doesn’t it?


Maybe in 20 years we’ll be able to calculate a thing I just made up called a “mental screen?”

This attempt from Carter Verhaeghe has a low PGR, where Adin Hill should make this save, and Tkachuk doesn’t get a point. But you can’t look at the frame above and tell me he’s not the leading reason why Hill fails to make this save, and why the Panthers are now just one game back in the Stanley Cup Final.

The Game-Tying Goal

When the Panthers pulled their goalie, Tkachuk did what a lot of superstars do – they recognize the defence can no longer play man-on-man, and they look for ways to get lost.

It’s common when defending a 5-on-6 for the D to switch to fronting shots from distance, as getting tied up with any one player in front can lead to outnumbered situations down low (if there are two D in front, and one gets tied up while the other team has more skaters, well… that’s pretty dire).

Watch Tkachuk get lost behind the net, then emerge net-front beneath the Vegas defence.

Advertisement

We just saw a goal that graded out as a “low quality” PGR chance but, well, the game-tying goal was anything but. By the time Tkachuk got his stick on this puck, it’s the second-highest rated PGR opportunity of the entire playoffs. Look at all this green, it’s like Augusta National in April:


Great players often get themselves to quiet spots where if they get the puck, the opportunity will be so great it will lead to a goal (think Sidney Crosby constantly lurking off the back post with the goalie pulled). The Panthers created the bounce they needed here, and Tkachuk made no mistake.

Here’s where that shot attempt ranked in terms of PGR (the X-axis along the bottom), with the Y-axis being “goalie angle to puck,” as in, how open was the net? That’s Tkachuk, highlighted on the right:


The other one we’ve highlighted here is the save Adin Hill made in Game 1 of the Cup Final, just as a fun little bonus nugget, to see how ridiculous that save really was. But I digress. Back to Tkachuk.

The Game-Opening Goal

One of the greatest difficulties about scoring in the post-season is getting off the wall. Just four minutes into a game the Panthers had to win, Tkachuk made this slick little back-spin-and-slip to Brandon Montour, who shot from distance:


While this goal had nearly double the likelihood of going in than the OT winner, it still grades out as a low-quality chance for a simple reason: most shots taken from this far out with this many people around hit something instead of going in. All the factors that stop attempts from turning into goals are considered, and there are a couple bodies in the “shot cone” (from the puck to the posts) here. The goalie is square, in his stance, and the shot comes from distance, as you can see from the PGR factors pie chart below:


What increases the chances of this going in is pretty clear: “possible goalie vision block” is bright green, meaning Hill simply can’t see this shot. (A neat wrinkle in working with this model: it seems a possible vision block increases the likelihood of a “low quality” chance going in, but doesn’t always help on a “high quality” chance because it’s just another thing that can get in the way of the puck.)

In the end, it’s Tkachuk who makes yet another cheeky, small play that influences the Panthers getting a chance, which found their way into the net just enough times to get the win in Game 3. They’re 7-0 in overtime in the playoffs, and the Panthers’ leader is a massive reason why they’ve had so much success in those situations.

Tkachuk’s got his paws in everything for them, and if he continues to focus those energies on offence, they’ve got a chance to claw their way back into this series.

Advertisement

.acf-block-preview .br-related-links-wrapper {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr);
gap: 20px;
}

.acf-block-preview .br-related-links-wrapper a {
pointer-events: none;
cursor: default;
text-decoration: none;
color: black;
}

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Aaron Gordon Explains What Makes Nikola Jokic So Special

Published

on


(Photo by Matthew Stockman/Getty Images)

 

The Denver Nuggets are living a magical moment after taking a 2-1 lead in the 2023 NBA Finals over the Miami Heat.

They know the job is far from done, but they should be feeling good about their chances knowing how well they played in their two wins.

Advertisement

Nikola Jokic has been on a tear during the entire playoffs and when the Finals started, he took it to the next level.

Everybody is in awe of Jokic right now, and teammate Aaron Gordon had the ultimate praise for the center.

Gordon explains that just like Magic Johnson, Jokic is changing the game with his abilities despite his size.

Nikola Jokic was never known for being an athletic player.

But the Serbian star makes the game look easy and he is pretty good at it.

The things he does on the court aren’t easy and it takes a special talent to pull off what Jokic has done so far.

During his first appearance in the championship series, Jokic has played like he’s been doing this all his life.

Advertisement

He’s averaged 33.3 points, 14.0 rebounds, and 9.3 assists so far, taking the Nuggets to two wins over the Miami Heat.

In Game 3, he became the first player to record a 30-point, 20-rebound, and 10-assist triple-double in the Finals.

Jokic is simply on that level, and it’s hard to make a case against him being the best player in the world right now.

Winning the title will confirm what everybody knows, and it would be the perfect closure to his season.

The post Aaron Gordon Explains What Makes Nikola Jokic So Special appeared first on The Cold Wire.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending